| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Garp
Allan Clarke
Joined: 06 May 2008
Posts: 694
|
|
| Back to top |
|
halfaperson
David Batty
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Posts: 1157
|
 Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2009 7:38 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Quote: | The defence will say he suffered an abnormality of mind which impaired his responsibility.
|
Ahh right. Three months suspended then with some nice therapy.
_________________
I might Be Middle Class but I'm Hard. Al Dente you might say
|
|
| Back to top |
|
cardboardbox?Youwerelucky
Niiiiii..!!
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2227
Location: lincolnshire
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
It just staggers me that people like this would be allowed to return to society at some point in his joke of an existence.
fucking eye for an eye in my book - put him in a room with her relatives and see how he comes out - sick twat |
|
| Back to top |
|
ArmleyWhite
David Batty
Joined: 10 May 2007
Posts: 1052
Location: PROUD TO BE IN THE 1%
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 9:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Playing devils advocate for a moment, and trying like to fukc not to let my obvious reaction to surface, but it appears the boy is mentally sick. Lets face it, to carry out such an attack on one so small, does indicate he's not right in the head!
I'm not saying let him off, nor go easy, but I am saying that the sensationalism reporting of the event may be clouding the judgments of rational thinking. Lock him up in a secure mental institution and find out why. Th story horrifies me beyond belief, but there are serious questions to be answered here. If he's too young to be named then surely too young to left in charge of a small child. I'm not blaming the mother and I can't imagine how she feels at all. However, why was one so young allowed to look after another small child?
To take the attitude of "an eye for an eye" is silly, imo. That makes us, or his jury, no better then he. He needs, as already said, locked away for a very long time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
cardboardbox?Youwerelucky
Niiiiii..!!
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 2227
Location: lincolnshire
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2009 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ArmleyWhite wrote: | Playing devils advocate for a moment, and trying like to fukc not to let my obvious reaction to surface, but it appears the boy is mentally sick. Lets face it, to carry out such an attack on one so small, does indicate he's not right in the head!
I'm not saying let him off, nor go easy, but I am saying that the sensationalism reporting of the event may be clouding the judgments of rational thinking. Lock him up in a secure mental institution and find out why. Th story horrifies me beyond belief, but there are serious questions to be answered here. If he's too young to be named then surely too young to left in charge of a small child. I'm not blaming the mother and I can't imagine how she feels at all. However, why was one so young allowed to look after another small child?
To take the attitude of "an eye for an eye" is silly, imo. That makes us, or his jury, no better then he. He needs, as already said, locked away for a very long time. |
Fecking kill the cnut    |
|
| Back to top |
|
raveydavey
Eddie Gray
Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 3952
Location: Leeds Yorkshire England
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
