everythingleeds.myfastforum.org Forum Index

You know sometimes you read something that you don't believe
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    everythingleeds.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Leeds United Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Tanhilltimmy
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 160
Location: miles from nowhere

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:16 am    Post subject: You know sometimes you read something that you don't believe Reply with quote

like this:


Leeds have been kicked out of the FA for not paying their debts. (The Sun)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HarryofOz
Everything Leeds Sponsor
Everything Leeds Sponsor


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 1515
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But if its in the Sun it must be true



_________________
There's no 'I' in 'team'. But then there's no 'I' in 'useless smug colleague', either. And there're four in 'platitude-quoting idiot'. Go figure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HarryofOz
Everything Leeds Sponsor
Everything Leeds Sponsor


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 1515
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lets just start our comp, lets just start our own comp na na na na na na na na na na.



_________________
There's no 'I' in 'team'. But then there's no 'I' in 'useless smug colleague', either. And there're four in 'platitude-quoting idiot'. Go figure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tanhilltimmy
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 160
Location: miles from nowhere

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LEEDS have been kicked out of the FA after failing to pay debts.

The League One side broke rules aimed at making sure rival teams are paid any money owed.

FA regulations state clubs coming out of administration must repay in full any other clubs and players.

As a result Leeds will not be able to vote at the FA AGM and will lose all ticket privileges for the FA Cup.

However, they can carry on playing in all competitions and will regain their status when they abide by the rules.

Leeds were docked 15 points by the Football League for breaking rules on administration.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
HarryofOz
Everything Leeds Sponsor
Everything Leeds Sponsor


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 1515
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 5:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You mean it really is true...damn my sarcastic post.



_________________
There's no 'I' in 'team'. But then there's no 'I' in 'useless smug colleague', either. And there're four in 'platitude-quoting idiot'. Go figure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andywatson
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 83

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 6:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought part of Bates buy back deal included money to pay all footballing creditors- and this was one of the reasons the Inland Revenue were so upset?

Don't tell me he hasn't started sticking bills straight in the bin again already? Rolling Eyes


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BillH
Allan Clarke
Allan Clarke


Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 510

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I take my initial comment back. The club statement would appear to address the article:

Quote:
Further to a report in The Sun newspaper on Friday morning which claimed we have been "kicked out of the FA" the club has issued the following statement...

The club has made an application to the Football Association to transfer full membership following administration.

The Football Association have not yet approved this request as we have been unable to demonstrate that all NON FOOTBALL CREDITORS have been satisfied.

All monies owed to other Football Clubs and members of the football family have been met in full. The reason that non-football creditors have not been satisfied is that the CVA was not completed due to the stance of the HMRC.

The club is still able to play football in all competitions, including the FA Cup, but until the membership is transferred we will be unable to vote at any general meetings of the FA or receive FA Cup final tickets that are made available to member clubs.

The club would prefer to be a full member of the FA, but it is also comfortable that not being a member will not prevent us from doing anything we need to do.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
HarryofOz
Everything Leeds Sponsor
Everything Leeds Sponsor


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 1515
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BillH wrote:
I take my initial comment back. The club statement would appear to address the article:

Quote:
Further to a report in The Sun newspaper on Friday morning which claimed we have been "kicked out of the FA" the club has issued the following statement...

The club has made an application to the Football Association to transfer full membership following administration.

The Football Association have not yet approved this request as we have been unable to demonstrate that all NON FOOTBALL CREDITORS have been satisfied.

All monies owed to other Football Clubs and members of the football family have been met in full. The reason that non-football creditors have not been satisfied is that the CVA was not completed due to the stance of the HMRC.

The club is still able to play football in all competitions, including the FA Cup, but until the membership is transferred we will be unable to vote at any general meetings of the FA or receive FA Cup final tickets that are made available to member clubs.

The club would prefer to be a full member of the FA, but it is also comfortable that not being a member will not prevent us from doing anything we need to do.


Does this mean that we will never pay the debts and will remain a non-full member forever?

Is there no intention to settle those debts and get our status back?



_________________
There's no 'I' in 'team'. But then there's no 'I' in 'useless smug colleague', either. And there're four in 'platitude-quoting idiot'. Go figure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BillH
Allan Clarke
Allan Clarke


Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 510

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

HarryofOz wrote:
Does this mean that we will never pay the debts and will remain a non-full member forever?

Is there no intention to settle those debts and get our status back?

Harry, according to the club it isn't about debts. It's about the process through which the club was acquired from the administrators not being done with creditor approval, so it is impossible to demonstrate that any of them were satisfied.

In effect it means that unless the FA relent and make an exception or change their rules the club will never be a member of the FA again, in theory. The process is done and dusted from the club's point of view and any rules that were broken will remain broken. Even if he wanted to, there's nothing Bates can do now to fix it.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
HarryofOz
Everything Leeds Sponsor
Everything Leeds Sponsor


Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 1515
Location: Sydney, Australia

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 8:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cheers Bill.



_________________
There's no 'I' in 'team'. But then there's no 'I' in 'useless smug colleague', either. And there're four in 'platitude-quoting idiot'. Go figure.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
andywatson
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 83

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As I see it the only real effect of this is the various employees/ affiliated hangers on won't get freebie FA cup final tickets for the forseeable future.

Although it is nice to see the club is being run in such a way as the FA won't have anything to do with us Rolling Eyes Just another example of Bates doing his best to ruin the reputation of the club.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tanhilltimmy
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 160
Location: miles from nowhere

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

FL
FA
HMRC
KPMG

just how many organisations with acranims can Bates blame... Confused
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BillH
Allan Clarke
Allan Clarke


Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 510

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I should add that it isn't entirely clear what the problem is. If it's the lack of a CVA then it's just another consequence of Bates' little summer scam, but if the club cannot prove that they paid the administrators the money they bid to buy the club then the whole thing is a lot more serious. The O/S suggests it might be the former by blaming the HMRC, but the news reports aren't as obvious.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tanhilltimmy
Jack Charlton
Jack Charlton


Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Posts: 160
Location: miles from nowhere

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

http://football.guardian.co.uk/Ne...4456,00.html?gusrc=rss&feed=5
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
BillH
Allan Clarke
Allan Clarke


Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 510

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

They're all regurgitating the same story they got off the press agency. It doesn't help clear anything up though: is it money owed before administration that is being demanded (which the reference to the money owed to HMRC would suggest, but which is surely done with as part of the admin process) or is it money owed to the creditors as part of the admin buyout that hasn't been paid, which is another matter altogether.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Cockney White
Boobmeister
Boobmeister


Joined: 09 May 2007
Posts: 3277
Location: So far from Leeds it's not funny..

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

From the FA themselves
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
BillH
Allan Clarke
Allan Clarke


Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 510

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rolling Eyes

Clear as mud. How have the new company failed to satisfy the non-football creditors, that's the real question here. Is it the way the admin process was concluded that is the problem, or have the new company failed to uphold the agreement under which they bought the club?


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Baldy
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 2139
Location: Ballina NSW

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

If we are no longer members of the FA, could this mean that it is there way out of ruling on our 15 point appeal, thus avoiding them confronting the Football League ?


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
BillH
Allan Clarke
Allan Clarke


Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 510

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Baldy wrote:
If we are no longer members of the FA, could this mean that it is there way out of ruling on our 15 point appeal, thus avoiding them confronting the Football League ?

I doubt it. The FL competition is still held under the FA overall jurisdiction.

I can't see it winning too many to our side of the argument though, whichever way you look at it. It could explain why the club have been so vague about the whole "appeal to the FA" business.


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Baldy
Site Admin
Site Admin


Joined: 07 May 2007
Posts: 2139
Location: Ballina NSW

PostPosted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But correct me if im wrong, if we are no longer members of the FA, they hold no juridiction over us and therfore would be unable to rule on the points deduction..

This just goes from bad to bloody worse, Crying or Very sad


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    everythingleeds.myfastforum.org Forum Index -> Leeds United Chat All times are GMT - 1 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Page 1 of 4

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Card File  Gallery  Forum Archive
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Theme created by Vjacheslav Trushkin